Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of Turkmenistan
447 F.3d 411 (5th Cir. 2006)
A state leaves its oil company with $17,000 so an award cannot be collected
- In one lineEn una línea
- A controlling owner that strips an entity of assets to defeat a creditor can be held liable as its alter ego.El dueño que vacía de activos a la entidad para frustrar a un acreedor puede responder como su alter ego.
- RuleRegla
- Alter ego liability turns on whether the owner exercised total domination of the entity and used that control to perpetrate a fraud or injustice against the creditor, such as undercapitalizing it to avoid an award.
- Why this case is herePor qué está aquí este caso
- Camp's chapter 4 case on alter ego factors applied to a parent: control plus the use of the entity to avoid a known liability.
- Procedural posturePostura procesal
- Bridas sought to enforce an arbitration award against Turkmenistan as the alter ego of its state-owned company; the district court refused; the Fifth Circuit reversed and held the government bound.
0:00
Say the answer out loud before revealing each part. Rate yourself honestly; the case comes back sooner when you miss.Di la respuesta en voz alta antes de revelar cada parte. Califícate con honestidad; el caso vuelve antes si fallas.
Panic kit: “Could you repeat the question, please?” · “Let me make sure I have the facts right: …” · “I'm not certain, but I'd argue … because …”Kit de pánico: “Could you repeat the question, please?” · “Let me make sure I have the facts right: …” · “I'm not certain, but I'd argue … because …”
How did it go?¿Cómo te fue?