lack Letter
BAU.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 1979stubesbozounverifiedsin verificarSkim briefBrief rápido

Brunswick Corp. v. Waxman

599 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1979)

A seller knowingly deals with a no-asset corporation, then wants the owners to pay

In one lineEn una línea
A contract creditor that knowingly dealt with a shell corporation cannot pierce the veil to reach its owners.El acreedor contractual que a sabiendas contrató con una sociedad cascarón no puede levantar el velo para alcanzar a los dueños.
RuleRegla
Where the creditor knew the corporation was a no-asset entity and looked to it alone, there is no fraud or injustice to justify disregarding the entity.
Why this case is herePor qué está aquí este caso
The contrast case: a contract creditor who dealt with the shell knowingly got exactly the bargain it made.
Procedural posturePostura procesal
Brunswick sued the Waxmans personally on the corporation's debt for bowling equipment; the district court refused to pierce; the Second Circuit affirmed.
piercing the corporate veil (alter ego)

AssignedAsignado: 2026-10-15

Read the public opinionLeer la opinión (texto público). SourceFuente: Skim brief from memory of the public opinion; verify facts and holding against the opinion before citing..