PALSU.S. Supreme Court (Chief Justice Warren), 1966stubesbozounverifiedsin verificarSkim briefBrief rápido

Miranda v. Arizona

384 U.S. 436 (1966)

Confessions after hours of questioning with no warning of the right to silence

In one lineEn una línea: Before custodial interrogation, police must warn a suspect of the right to remain silent and to counsel, or the statements are inadmissible.Antes de un interrogatorio bajo custodia, la policía debe advertir al sospechoso de su derecho a guardar silencio y a un abogado, o las declaraciones son inadmisibles.
RuleRegla: Statements made during custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless the suspect was warned of the right to remain silent, that anything said can be used against him, and of the right to an attorney, retained or appointed, and the suspect knowingly waived those rights.
Why this case is herePor qué está aquí este caso: Assigned for Nov 13 with Duncan and Roper: the three cases map the rights of the accused.
Procedural posturePostura procesal: Four consolidated cases of confessions obtained during custodial interrogation without warnings; convictions reversed (three) or affirmed (one) according to the new rule.

AssignedAsignado: 2026-11-13

Drill completeDrill terminado