Upjohn warning (corporate Miranda)
The statement company counsel gives an employee before an interview: I represent the company, not you; this conversation is privileged, but the privilege belongs to the company, which may waive it and share what you say, including with the government.
In SpanishEn español
advertencia Upjohn (Miranda corporativo)
Lo que el abogado de la empresa dice a un empleado antes de entrevistarlo: represento a la empresa, no a ti; esta conversación es privilegiada, pero el privilegio es de la empresa, que puede renunciarlo y compartir lo que digas, incluso con el gobierno. Viene de Upjohn Co. v. United States (1981).
ExamplesEjemplos
- She opened the interview with the Upjohn warning and documented that the employee understood it. Abrió la entrevista con la advertencia Upjohn y documentó que el empleado la entendió.
AuthorityFuente: Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981)
RelatedRelacionados: who is the client (Rule 1.13), attorney-client privilege (in-house), internal investigation
Cases: United States v. Heppner (AI chats and privilege)
In your flashcardsEn tus flashcards