ScheduleCalendario
Every reading, assignment, review session and exam, by date.Cada lectura, entrega, sesión de repaso y examen, por fecha.
2026-08-24
- ReadingLecturaIntroduction: how attorneys communicate (emails and memos); sources of U.S. law IIntroducción: cómo se comunican los abogados (correos y memos); fuentes del derecho IA Lawyer Writes ch. 1; ch. 2 §§ I–II
2026-08-26
- ClassClaseClass 1: why the best lawyers are not always the best in-house lawyers; meet your faculty supervisor (lab)Clase 1: por qué los mejores abogados no siempre son los mejores abogados internos; conoce a tu supervisor académico (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 1; plus three short articles on lawyer competencies and emotional intelligence (Canvas)
- ReadingLecturaSources of U.S. law II: the court system, stare decisis, weight of authority, the BluebookFuentes del derecho II: sistema judicial, stare decisis, peso de las autoridades, el BluebookA Lawyer Writes finish ch. 2
2026-08-28
- AssignmentEntregaResearch and Reflection #1: company and industry overview (10 points; no AI)Investigación y reflexión #1: panorama de la empresa y la industria (10 puntos; sin AI)
- ReadingLecturaBeauchene v. Mississippi College and the SMU Student Code of Professional ResponsibilityBeauchene v. Mississippi College y el Código de Responsabilidad Profesional de SMUBeauchene v. Mississippi College
2026-08-31
- ReadingLecturaReading federal statutes: structure, interpretation, how to cite a statuteLeer leyes federales: estructura, interpretación, cómo citar una leyA Lawyer Writes ch. 3 and § 3.1 (reading statutes); ICW ch. 6; Bluebook 3–4 (before B1.2); 18–20 (before B12.1.4)
2026-09-01
- ReadingLecturaChapter 1: Agency principles (Highland Capital, Menard, Disney); Home Run Cards scenarioCapítulo 1: principios de agency (Highland Capital, Menard, Disney); escenario Home Run CardsBusiness Law and Policy 5–33 (ch. 1)Ames v. Great Southern Bank · Highland Capital Management LP v. Schneider · Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc. · In re The Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigationto confirmpor confirmar
2026-09-02
- ClassClaseClass 2: who is your client (the organizational maze); the loyalty trap (lab)Clase 2: quién es tu cliente (el laberinto organizacional); la trampa de la lealtad (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 2 and ch. 5; plus an article on preserving the attorney-client privilege for in-house counsel (Canvas)
- ReadingLecturaReading state statutes: comprehension, Bluebook, locating a statuteLeer leyes estatales: comprensión, Bluebook, localizar una leyA Lawyer Writes review § 3.1; ICW review ch. 6; ch. 7; Bluebook 3–4; 18–20; 119–125 (before rule 12.4)
2026-09-04
- ReadingLecturaLaw in the United States, chapter 1Law in the United States, capítulo 1Abernathy 3–14
2026-09-07
- EventEventoLabor Day: no classLabor Day: sin clase
2026-09-09
- ClassClaseClass 3: outside counsel: hiring, firing and getting your money's worth; write the pitch, review the invoice (lab)Clase 3: abogados externos: contratar, despedir y hacer valer el dinero; escribe el pitch, revisa la factura (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 8 and ch. 12
- ReadingLecturaReading cases I and online legal research ILeer casos I e investigación en línea IA Lawyer Writes § 3.2 (reading judicial opinions); Bluebook 11–14 (before parallel citations in state court documents); 95–103 (before 10.3); 105–107; ICW ch. 1
2026-09-10
- AssignmentEntregaRapid Fire: selecting outside counsel (200–300 words, 2 points)Rapid Fire: elegir abogados externos (200–300 palabras, 2 puntos)
2026-09-11
- AssignmentEntregaPaper topic proposal due (5 points; AI allowed with disclosure)Entrega de la propuesta de tema del trabajo (5 puntos; AI permitida con declaración)
- ReadingLecturaSeparation of powers: Constitution art. I §§ 1–3 and art. II; Law in the United States, chapter 6División de poderes: Constitución art. I §§ 1–3 y art. II; Law in the United States, capítulo 6Constitution art. I §§ 1–3; art. II (skip § 1 cls. 2–5); Abernathy 219–231, 235–244; plus ch. 6 A.1–7 (2d ed. pp. 193–204) per the Sept. 10 announcementYoungstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (the Steel Seizure Case)
2026-09-14
- ReadingLecturaReading cases II and online legal research IILeer casos II e investigación en línea IIA Lawyer Writes § 3.2; ICW ch. 2
2026-09-16
- ClassClaseClass 4: communicating like a trusted advisor: the BLUF framework; plain English memo and 90-second elevator brief (lab)Clase 4: comunicar como asesor de confianza: el marco BLUF; memo en inglés llano y elevator brief de 90 segundos (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 6, pp. 175–205 only
- ReadingLecturaResearch organization and issue spottingOrganizar la investigación y detectar issuesA Lawyer Writes ch. 4 and ch. 5; ICW ch. 3
2026-09-17
- ReadingLecturaChapter 2: Types of business forms (Creel, Gotham Partners, Elf Atochem, Robinson); Wines Exotics scenarioCapítulo 2: formas societarias (Creel, Gotham Partners, Elf Atochem, Robinson); escenario Wines ExoticsBusiness Law and Policy 35–65 (ch. 2)Creel v. Lilly · Elf Atochem North America, Inc. v. Jaffari · Robinson v. Glynnto confirmpor confirmar
- AssignmentEntregaRapid Fire: translation exercise, explain a legal issue to a board member in 200 words (no AI)Rapid Fire: ejercicio de traducción, explica un tema jurídico a un consejero en 200 palabras (sin AI)
2026-09-18
- ReadingLecturaCourts: Law in the United States, chapter 3; Constitution art. III §§ 1–2Tribunales: Law in the United States, capítulo 3; Constitución art. III §§ 1–2Abernathy 109–139; per the Sept. 17 announcement, ch. 3 §§ A–B through Republican Party of Minnesota v. White; Constitution art. III §§ 1–2Republican Party of Minnesota v. White
2026-09-21
- EventEventoNo class (made up on Friday, Oct. 2, 2:00 pm, Florence 201)Sin clase (se repuso el viernes 2 de oct., 2:00 pm, Florence 201)
2026-09-23
- ClassClaseClass 5: compliance, risk and the sixth sense (guest chief legal and compliance officers); hotline triage: the call came in (lab)Clase 5: cumplimiento, riesgo y el sexto sentido (invitados: directores jurídico y de cumplimiento); triage de la línea de denuncia (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 7 and ch. 11
- ReadingLecturaThe legal argument (IRAC in class, negligence scenario)El argumento jurídico (IRAC en clase, escenario de negligencia)A Lawyer Writes ch. 6 and ch. 7; Bluebook B10.2; rule 10.9; ICW ch. 5 (online)
2026-09-25
- AssignmentEntregaReflection #2: mid-semester reflection (10 points; no AI)Reflexión #2: reflexión de medio semestre (10 puntos; sin AI)
- ReadingLecturaJudges and the Supreme Court: Law in the United States, chapter 5Jueces y la Corte Suprema: Law in the United States, capítulo 5Abernathy 161–179, 187–191; per the Sept. 24 announcement, ch. 5 pp. 143–155 (Marbury, through note 10)Marbury v. Madison
2026-09-28
- ReadingLecturaExplaining the lawExplicar la reglaA Lawyer Writes ch. 7; Bluebook B10.1.3; rule 10.3.1; T1; ICW ch. 4 (questions 1–7)
2026-09-30
- ClassClaseClass 6: in the boardroom: governance, fiduciary duties and building the fortress; board presentation simulations (lab)Clase 6: en la sala del consejo: gobierno corporativo, deberes fiduciarios y construir la fortaleza; simulaciones de presentación al consejo (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 4
- ReadingLecturaExplaining and applying the lawExplicar y aplicar la reglaA Lawyer Writes ch. 7; ch. 8 introduction, §§ 8.1–8.3; Bluebook B10.1.3; rule 10.3.1; T1; ICW ch. 4 (questions 8–14)
2026-10-02
- ReadingLecturaFederalism: the Commerce Clause, the Supremacy Clause, the Tenth Amendment; Law in the United States, chapter 8; Heart of Atlanta MotelFederalismo: Commerce Clause, Supremacy Clause, Décima Enmienda; Law in the United States, capítulo 8; Heart of Atlanta MotelConstitution art. I § 8 cl. 3 (listed as art. III in the schedule); art. VI cl. 2; amend. X; Abernathy 377–383Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- ClassClase · 14:00–15:25Make-up class (Florence 201): applying the law; I/CREAC assignment on People v. JoeselClase de reposición (Florence 201): aplicar la regla; tarea I/CREAC sobre People v. JoeselA Lawyer Writes ch. 8 introduction, §§ 8.4–8.5
2026-10-05
- ReadingLecturaApplying the law; peer review of the I/CREAC assignment with the rubric; counter-analysis (§ 8.4)Aplicar la regla; revisión entre pares de la tarea I/CREAC con la rúbrica; counter-analysis (§ 8.4)A Lawyer Writes §§ 8.3–8.5
2026-10-06
- AssignmentEntregaChapter 3 scenario: the breakfast restaurant (partner-shareholder agreement provisions)Escenario del capítulo 3: el restaurante de desayunos (cláusulas del acuerdo de socios y accionistas)Business Law and Policy 67–110 (ch. 3)Triggs v. Triggs · Ritchie v. Rupeto confirmpor confirmar
2026-10-07
- ClassClaseClass 7: deal time: M&A, due diligence and the in-house quarterback; due diligence war room: find the deal killer (lab)Clase 7: hora del deal: M&A, due diligence y el quarterback interno; cuarto de guerra de due diligence: encuentra el deal killer (laboratorio)
- ReadingLecturaBeginning and ending the legal argument; the Discussion sectionAbrir y cerrar el argumento; la sección DiscussionA Lawyer Writes ch. 9 and ch. 12
2026-10-09
- AssignmentEntregaMid-term student evaluation due in CORE ELMS (read only by the program director)Evaluación de medio semestre en CORE ELMS (solo la lee el director del programa)
- ExamExamenMidtermExamen parcial
- AssignmentEntrega · 14:00–15:25Make-up class (Florence 201): Question Presented and Brief Answer; IIED research assignment due at midnight (case chart of 6 to 10 Texas cases)Clase de reposición (Florence 201): Question Presented y Brief Answer; entrega a medianoche de la investigación de IIED (cuadro de 6 a 10 casos de Texas)A Lawyer Writes ch. 13Twyman v. Twyman · GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Bruce · Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger · Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Johnson · Draker v. Schreiber
2026-10-12
- ReadingLecturaPreparing for the memo: sample memo; the eight cases for the Discussion section announcedPreparar el memo: memo de muestra; se anuncian los ocho casos para la sección DiscussionTwyman v. Twyman · Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Johnson · Draker v. Schreiber · GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Bruce · Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger · Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v. Jones · Weber v. Fernandez · Gonzales v. Gonzales
2026-10-14
- ClassClaseClass 8: sports contracts and contrasts: professional vs. college; Red Ink deadline day: four deals before the window closes (lab)Clase 8: contratos deportivos y contrastes: profesional frente a universitario; Red Ink, día límite: cuatro deals antes de que cierre la ventana (laboratorio)Inside Counsel article: the case for plain-language contracts (Canvas)
- AssignmentEntregaAI-assisted playbook review of a sports services MSA on Harvey (ungraded, marked complete)Revisión de un MSA de servicios deportivos contra el playbook con AI en Harvey (sin calificación, se marca como completada)
- ReadingLecturaQuestion Presented and Brief Answer (continued); keep working on the Discussion sectionQuestion Presented y Brief Answer (continuación); seguir con la sección DiscussionA Lawyer Writes ch. 13
2026-10-15
- AssignmentEntregaChapter 4 scenario: advocacy and independent judgment (piercing the veil of Hyper-Thriller Titan)Escenario del capítulo 4: advocacy y criterio propio (levantar el velo de Hyper-Thriller Titan)Business Law and Policy ch. 4 (veil piercing, single business enterprise, corporate governance)Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of Turkmenistan · Minton v. Cavaney · Brunswick Corp. v. Waxman · United States v. Jon-T Chemicals, Inc. · Gardemal v. Westin Hotel Co.
2026-10-16
- AssignmentEntregaAbstract of the paper due (250–350 words, 5 points)Entrega del abstract del trabajo (250–350 palabras, 5 puntos)
- EventEventoNo class (cancelled Oct. 15; a make-up session will be scheduled)Sin clase (cancelada el 15 de oct.; se programará una sesión de reposición)
2026-10-19
- ReadingLecturaStatement of FactsStatement of FactsA Lawyer Writes ch. 14
2026-10-20
- ReadingLecturaMisrepresentation and fraud: R.2d §§ 159–164, 169; the Laidlaw discussionMisrepresentation y fraude: R.2d §§ 159–164, 169; la discusión de LaidlawSelections R.2d §§ 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 169; Farnsworth 508 (Laidlaw, Part B only), 510–511, 513–516, 518Laidlaw v. Organ
2026-10-21
- ClassClaseClass 9: employment law for the business lawyer: hiring, firing and everything that can go wrong; the termination checklist (lab)Clase 9: derecho laboral para el abogado de negocios: contratar, despedir y todo lo que puede salir mal; la checklist de despido (laboratorio)
- EventEventoNo classSin clase
- Review sessionSesión de repaso · 15:15–16:15Review session: a Drennan-type problem and three sample exam questions (UCC statute of frauds and statute of limitations; fraud and misrepresentation short answers)Sesión de repaso: un problema tipo Drennan y tres preguntas de examen (statute of frauds y prescripción bajo el UCC; preguntas cortas de fraude y misrepresentation)
2026-10-22
- ReadingLecturaMistake and capacity: R.2d §§ 151–154, 157 and §§ 14–16; risk of mistake in sales of goodsError y capacidad: R.2d §§ 151–154, 157 y §§ 14–16; el riesgo del error en ventas de bienesSelections R.2d §§ 151, 152, 153, 154, 157; §§ 14, 15, 16; Farnsworth 1090 (from “Sale of Goods”) to 1093 (stop at “The Risks…”)
- AssignmentEntregaRapid Fire: one thing I would actually do (AI allowed with disclosure)Rapid Fire: una cosa que sí haría (AI permitida con declaración)
2026-10-23
- ReadingLectura · 09:45–12:05Amendments and citizenship: art. V, amends. I, II, VI, XIII–XV; Chae Chan Ping; treaties in U.S. courts (ch. 9 C); Brown v. Board (ch. 11 A, note 2); ch. 12 introductionEnmiendas y ciudadanía: art. V, enmiendas I, II, VI, XIII–XV; Chae Chan Ping; tratados en tribunales de EE. UU. (cap. 9 C); Brown v. Board (cap. 11 A, nota 2); introducción del cap. 12Constitution art. V; amends. I, II, VI, XIII, XIV, XV; Abernathy 390–391 (ch. 9 C, note 1 on treaties; skip Sosa); ch. 11 A (Brown, note 2); ch. 12 introduction; speech pages 667–671, 680–682, 687–691 from the original scheduleChae Chan Ping v. United States (The Chinese Exclusion Case) · Elk v. Wilkins · Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka
2026-10-26
- AssignmentEntregaClass cancelled; IIED memo Discussion section due at midnight (2–3 pages)Clase cancelada; entrega a medianoche de la sección Discussion del memo de IIED (2–3 páginas)Twyman v. Twyman · GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Bruce · Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger · Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Johnson · Draker v. Schreiber · Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v. Jones · Weber v. Fernandez · Gonzales v. Gonzales
2026-10-27
- ReadingLecturaInterpreting contract language: methods, vagueness and ambiguity problems, R.2d §§ 201–204Interpretación del lenguaje contractual: métodos, problemas de vaguedad y ambigüedad, R.2d §§ 201–204Farnsworth 564 (start at “Methods…”, stop at the Notes), 565 Problem (1), 566 Problem (3); Selections R.2d §§ 201, 202, 203, 204; Selections UCC § 2-302 and comments; R.2d §§ 208, 178, 179, 184(1)
2026-10-28
- ClassClaseClass 10: the AI-ready legal department: technology, data privacy and governing innovation; draft the AI policy, your company needs one by Friday (lab)Clase 10: el departamento jurídico listo para la AI: tecnología, privacidad de datos y gobernar la innovación; redacta la política de AI, tu empresa la necesita para el viernes (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 14; plus United States v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026), ABA Formal Opinion 512 and Texas Ethics Opinion 705 (Canvas)United States v. Heppner (AI chats and privilege)
- ReadingLecturaConclusion and editing your memoConclusion y edición del memoA Lawyer Writes ch. 15 and ch. 16
- Review sessionSesión de repaso · 15:15–16:15Review session: a fact pattern on UCC §§ 2-201 and 2-725, and short questions on mutual and unilateral mistakeSesión de repaso: un caso práctico sobre UCC §§ 2-201 y 2-725, y preguntas cortas sobre error mutuo y unilateral
2026-10-29
- ReadingLecturaChapter 5: Corporate governance (board, committees, ALI Principles, 2025 developments)Capítulo 5: gobierno corporativo (consejo, comités, principios del ALI, novedades de 2025)Business Law and Policy ch. 5, about pp. 143–182 (Business Roundtable factors ~148; audit committee ~150; Conference Board ~159; ALI §§ 2.01, 3.01 ~169–176; SEC body-armor case ~182)In re The Walt Disney Co. Derivative Litigation · SEC v. DHB Industries (Point Blank) and its former outside directorsto confirmpor confirmar
- ReadingLecturaUCC interpretation: course of performance, course of dealing and usage of trade (§ 1-303); good faith; Hurst and FrigalimentInterpretación bajo el UCC: course of performance, course of dealing y usage of trade (§ 1-303); buena fe; Hurst y FrigalimentSelections UCC § 1-303 (read closely); §§ 2-306(2), 2-314, 2-315 (skim); R.2d § 205; UCC §§ 1-304, 1-201(20); Farnsworth 582–583 (Hurst), 575 (from Frigaliment) to 580, 581 n. 1Hurst v. W.J. Lake & Co. · Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp.
- AssignmentEntregaRapid Fire: your AI stack (2 points)Rapid Fire: tu AI stack (2 puntos)
2026-10-30
- AssignmentEntrega · DueEntrega 2026-11-01Update your course outline through the enforceability defensesActualiza tu outline del curso hasta las defensas contra la exigibilidad
- ReadingLecturaThe Loving Story (documentary) and Loving v. Virginia; due process and liberty: Lochner (ch. 10 A.1, notes 1–2); two articles on economic freedom (Canvas)The Loving Story (documental) y Loving v. Virginia; debido proceso y libertad: Lochner (cap. 10 A.1, notas 1–2); dos artículos sobre libertad económica (Canvas)Abernathy 558–577 (original schedule); ch. 10 A.1, Lochner with notes 1 and 2 (Oct. 26 announcement)Loving v. Virginia · Lochner v. New York
2026-11-02
- AssignmentEntregaTimesheet for week 9 (Oct. 26–30) in CORE ELMSHoja de horas de la semana 9 (26–30 oct.) en CORE ELMS
- AssignmentEntregaFull IIED memo due (5 pages): heading, Question Presented, Brief Answer, Facts, Discussion, Conclusion; class on professional emailsEntrega del memo completo de IIED (5 páginas): encabezado, Question Presented, Brief Answer, Facts, Discussion, Conclusion; clase sobre correos profesionalesA Lawyer Writes ch. 18 (professional emails); ICW ch. 8Twyman v. Twyman · Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Zeltwanger · GTE Southwest, Inc. v. Bruce · Standard Fruit & Vegetable Co. v. Johnson · Draker v. Schreiber · Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v. Jones
2026-11-03
- AssignmentEntregaExam question exercise: prior governance essay (1,200 words) — date to confirmEjercicio de pregunta de examen: ensayo anterior de gobierno corporativo (1,200 palabras); fecha por confirmarto confirmpor confirmar
2026-11-04
- ClassClaseClass 11: securities law and the in-house lawyer's minefield (full two-hour lecture)Clase 11: derecho de valores y el campo minado del abogado interno (conferencia completa de dos horas)Inside Counsel ch. 9, ch. 10 and ch. 13
- EventEventoNo class; ICW chapters 10 and 12Sin clase; capítulos 10 y 12 del ICWICW ch. 10 and ch. 12
2026-11-06
- AssignmentEntregaReflection #3: final reflection (10 points; no AI): the lawyer you want to become, the most underrated in-house skill, advice for the next cohort, a trusted-advisor moment, closing the loop on Reflection #1Reflexión #3: reflexión final (10 puntos; sin AI): el abogado que quieres ser, la habilidad interna más subestimada, consejo para la siguiente generación, un momento de asesor de confianza, cerrar el círculo con la reflexión #1
- ReadingLecturaCriminal procedure: Law in the United States, chapter 11Procedimiento penal: Law in the United States, capítulo 11Abernathy 597–606, 612–614, 619–623
2026-11-09
- AssignmentEntregaTimesheet for week 10 (Nov. 2–6) in CORE ELMSHoja de horas de la semana 10 (2–6 nov.) en CORE ELMS
- ReadingLecturaCommon mistakes and citation reviewErrores comunes y repaso de citasICW ch. 13 and ch. 15
2026-11-11
- ClassClaseClass 12: your career as in-house counsel, from first job to CLO; 45 seconds on LinkedIn and three sentences in person (lab)Clase 12: tu carrera como abogado interno, del primer empleo a CLO; 45 segundos en LinkedIn y tres oraciones en persona (laboratorio)Inside Counsel ch. 3
- EventEventoNo class; one-on-one sessions begin (book an appointment)Sin clase; empiezan las sesiones individuales (agenda una cita)
2026-11-12
- AssignmentEntregaRapid Fire: your future general counsel biography (2 points)Rapid Fire: tu biografía como futuro general counsel (2 puntos)
2026-11-13
- ReadingLecturaRights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona, Duncan v. Louisiana, Roper v. SimmonsDerechos del acusado: Miranda v. Arizona, Duncan v. Louisiana, Roper v. SimmonsMiranda v. Arizona · Duncan v. Louisiana · Roper v. Simmons
2026-11-16
- AssignmentEntregaTimesheet for week 11 (Nov. 9–13) in CORE ELMSHoja de horas de la semana 11 (9–13 nov.) en CORE ELMS
2026-11-18
- EventEvento · 17:45–19:30Class 13: the General Counsel's Desk, capstone networking reception (class photo 5:45, Armstrong Fieldhouse; reception 6:00–7:30)Clase 13: The General Counsel's Desk, recepción de networking (foto de grupo 5:45, Armstrong Fieldhouse; recepción 6:00–7:30)
2026-11-20
- Review sessionSesión de repasoReview session (the final is comprehensive and in class; date to be announced)Sesión de repaso (el final es comprensivo y en clase; fecha por anunciar)
2026-11-23
- AssignmentEntregaLast day of classes: 120 externship hours minimum must be complete; timesheet for week 12 (Nov. 16–20) dueÚltimo día de clases: deben estar completas las 120 horas mínimas del externship; hoja de horas de la semana 12 (16–20 nov.)
2026-11-30
- AssignmentEntregaFinal paper due (50 points): thesis-driven analysis from an in-house perspective, 15–20 pagesEntrega del trabajo final (50 puntos): análisis con tesis desde la perspectiva del abogado interno, 15–20 páginas
2026-12-04
- AssignmentEntregaFinal student evaluation in CORE ELMSEvaluación final del estudiante en CORE ELMS
2026-12-07
- ExamExamen · 13:30–17:30Final exam: one four-hour essay exam, open book and open notesExamen final: un solo examen de ensayo de cuatro horas, a libro y notas abiertos
2026-12-11
- AssignmentEntregaOptional extra credit for international LL.M.s (due Dec. 11): AI around the world (250–400 words, 2 pts); build your U.S. in-house toolkit (1 pt); decode the American GCCréditos extra opcionales para LL.M. internacionales (hasta el 11 de dic.): AI around the world (250–400 palabras, 2 pts); tu kit de abogado interno en EE. UU. (1 pt); decodifica al GC estadounidense